For a very long
time, in Asia, women were not viewed as important because they lack the
physical strength that mean have. People usually say that men were more
desirable because they can handle heavy labor jobs which provide food and
shelter for the family, while women are to stay home to cook, clean, bear children
and take care of the family. As a result of that, women are view as incapable
and vulnerable who are dominated by males. In The Sailor who Fell from Grace with the Sea we are introduced
Fusako a widow who is the owner of Rex, Ltd. “one of the oldest and best-known
luxuray shops in Yokohoma’s swank Motomachi district” (24). Unlike Yoriko
Kasuga, the “gullable beauty” (33) or the “chinese whore” (19) who need a male
presence, Fusako is an intelligent, decisive and strong business woman who has
no need for a male presence. For five years after her husband passed away
Fusako managed “business by herself” (24), she is able to place bids on
shipments before other buyers; “her policy is to emphisize quality labels while
offering a wide price range in every item”. She is also has precise decisions
for example when Yoriko Kasuga asks her to pick out gifts “for about twenty men”
(26); Fusako realized that the gifts were supposed to be bought in the summer
so instead of picking sweaters which would be in store near fall she picked out
“Caldin ties and some polo shirts and a few Jiff pens” (33-34). Not only did
Fusako manage the business on her own after her, husband died, she also had to
raise her 13 years-old son Noboru, who was 8 years-old at the time. In
conclusion, I find that because Fusako was not like the stereotypical hopeless
female who is born to serve in male dominate society she is a representation of
modern women who are independent.
Monday, 20 February 2012
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
It is "obscene for human beings to live only for themselves"
While surfing through blogs; I came across Rohit's blog ( http://missedink.blogspot.com/ ), in which he
blogged about Mishima's dedication to the life of a samurai. What I found interesting about it was the
youtube link, of Mishima’s last speech, that he posted along with the blog.
In the speech, he
talks about “dying for a ‘great cause’” (Mishima 1:32) and how it is now
something of the past. He states that because of the “democratic political
system” (Mishima 1:37) there is no need for a “great cause” (Mishima 1:35). This
“great cause” (Mishima 1:25) that he speaks of comes from the “need to die for something”
(Mishima 1:20) when they get “bored of living for themselves” (Mishima 1:13). I
found this interesting because it relates to a discussion that was brought up
in class about why Noboru disliked Ryuji. One of the points that were brought
up was that, Noboru was unhappy of the fact that Ryuji was going to give up the
life of a sailor so that he could live with Fusako. As Mishima’s values are expressed, I would
assume that Noboru feels that Ryuji is doing this out of his own selfishness;
since he is neglecting his job that is very dependant on, a sailor plays a very
important role in Japan (Japan is by the ocean meaning a lot supplies can be
deported and imported using ships). Therefore, as Noboru does not intend to let
Ryuji dishonor the “great cause” he kills Ryuji so that he would die an honorable
death.
I’m not sure if that
made sense but basically I wanted to say that since Mishima believes in death
for a “great cause”, as the author of sailor his values are put in the
storyline and since the ending is ambiguous; I think that Noboru kills Ryuji
before he can “live for himself” so that he can die for a “great cause”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)